|
Post by Disgruntled70sHab on Jan 27, 2015 16:45:37 GMT -5
CANADIENS (30-13-3) @ RANGERS (27-14-4) THU JAN 29, 2015 7:00 PM ET
All-time series 328-189-94 Montreal Madison Square Garden, NY Capacity: 18,200
TV: NBCSN,RDS,SNE,MSG
1970-71 Montreal Canadiens
1970-71 New York Rangers
|
|
|
Post by HFTO on Jan 29, 2015 18:03:28 GMT -5
Boy's got waxed last time Rags can skate just as well or better and they crash our net ....think we would do the same for a change...King Henry has a picnic more often than not when playing the Habs especially in NYC.
|
|
|
Post by CentreHice on Jan 29, 2015 19:10:09 GMT -5
Ari Hest is a fine-sounding artist.
|
|
|
Post by HFTO on Jan 29, 2015 19:18:08 GMT -5
DD just get the puck to the net...maddening
|
|
|
Post by CentreHice on Jan 29, 2015 19:25:51 GMT -5
Halfway through the first and we have 1 shot on goal.
Nice.
Now a PP.
|
|
|
Post by CentreHice on Jan 29, 2015 19:32:41 GMT -5
Where's the embellishment? I missed it....
|
|
|
Post by Skilly on Jan 29, 2015 19:33:31 GMT -5
That embellishment call may cost PK some coin ... I think that's his second or third this year
|
|
|
Post by CentreHice on Jan 29, 2015 19:35:46 GMT -5
How does Subban get a penalty there? For "embellishing" Kreider into dropping his gloves?
|
|
|
Post by Skilly on Jan 29, 2015 19:35:50 GMT -5
That was a smart decision by PK ... Walk away. Get the PP goal and then line him up later in the game .... Triple threat baby
|
|
|
Post by Skilly on Jan 29, 2015 19:37:29 GMT -5
What the hell did PK do there??
|
|
|
Post by Skilly on Jan 29, 2015 19:38:26 GMT -5
That was a total bullS call on PK Subban ... He was trying to get away to get into the play!
|
|
|
Post by CentreHice on Jan 29, 2015 19:39:40 GMT -5
That was a total bullS call on PK Subban ... He was trying to get away to get into the play! Yep...99 times out of 100 the guy who drops his gloves is the only one who goes....in a case like that.
|
|
|
Post by Skilly on Jan 29, 2015 19:40:01 GMT -5
Good job by one of the D ... Beaulieau?? ...to pull Staal down from behind. Take no crap, boys
|
|
|
Post by Skilly on Jan 29, 2015 19:42:12 GMT -5
How did Weise miss THAT!
|
|
|
Post by CentreHice on Jan 29, 2015 19:43:42 GMT -5
Lundqvist robs Weise.
Spirited game for sure....Subban on Kreider will be interesting.
Prust taking on Glass.
|
|
|
Post by Skilly on Jan 29, 2015 19:44:42 GMT -5
The Weise shot is under review .... That's a GOAL!
|
|
|
Post by CentreHice on Jan 29, 2015 19:45:17 GMT -5
That's a goal. Lundqvist's pad was behind the line when the puck hit it.
|
|
|
Post by HFTO on Jan 29, 2015 19:45:27 GMT -5
better than usual start but they wont give us that goal again..damn
|
|
|
Post by Skilly on Jan 29, 2015 19:45:48 GMT -5
That Bounces off Lundvists toe first behind the line
|
|
|
Post by CentreHice on Jan 29, 2015 19:45:50 GMT -5
They'd better freeze it on contact with the pad.
It's clearly over the line.
Come on, Toronto....
|
|
|
Post by CentreHice on Jan 29, 2015 19:46:52 GMT -5
Shouldn't be taking this long....
|
|
|
Post by HFTO on Jan 29, 2015 19:47:52 GMT -5
Looks like it catches the toe but the picture is blurred then it catches his pad and the goal line
|
|
|
Post by CentreHice on Jan 29, 2015 19:48:06 GMT -5
Complete BS....
Inconclusive my butt!
|
|
|
Post by Skilly on Jan 29, 2015 19:48:51 GMT -5
What effin ever ... There is a blur when it hit the toe, and they freeze it about 6 inches after initial contact ...that's BS
|
|
|
Post by CentreHice on Jan 29, 2015 19:50:04 GMT -5
What effin ever ... There is a blur when it hit the toe, and they freeze it about 6 inches after initial contact ...that's BS Exactly....they're choosing when to freeze the frame. It's clear from slo-mo that it was over the line when it hit the toe.
|
|
|
Post by HabSolute on Jan 29, 2015 19:50:11 GMT -5
I don't get it......How is this not a goal ?
|
|
|
Post by Skilly on Jan 29, 2015 19:51:04 GMT -5
All this talk of getting back at Kreider is annoying .... You want payback? Then run Lundqvist
|
|
|
Post by Disp on Jan 29, 2015 19:51:50 GMT -5
Getting hosed here. Complete lack of respect. That's a goal and PK's penalties don't get called on anyone else.
Run Lundqvist. Hard.
|
|
|
Post by Skilly on Jan 29, 2015 19:55:34 GMT -5
At least Kypreos and Colby Armstrong admit that the puck was blurred, but common sense states the puck is not that wide and that should have been a goal
"it's Blur-gate" - Colby Armstrong
|
|
|
Post by CentreHice on Jan 29, 2015 19:58:10 GMT -5
That's only "inconclusive" because the call on the ice was "no goal"?
If it had been called a goal, Toronto would've over-ruled it. That's what my money's on.
Robbery.
|
|