Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 12, 2015 20:57:45 GMT -5
Pacioretty might be hurt.
|
|
|
Post by Willie Dog on Mar 12, 2015 20:58:29 GMT -5
It's amazing how much better this team was at forechecking when we had the kids like ghetto and Thomas from the dogs up
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 12, 2015 21:00:41 GMT -5
Fans should be incensed. I'm hoping to see them boo the team off the ice, but instead they're walking out.
|
|
|
Post by Willie Dog on Mar 12, 2015 21:02:39 GMT -5
I don't think so...the Pens had Crosby and Malkin down the middle...two superstars. Malkin won the Art Ross with 113 pts. and Crosby finished third with 103. We have DD, Pleks, and Eller. While a new coach might come up with a better system and be able to adjust anything other than his crotch during a game....we're going to be all Price. We don't have the talent up front. Our D gets the puck to them....but it thins out dramatically if Max doesn't score. Not our year.....never was. It's been all Price.... MT had the same talent as Bylsma. It's the risk prevention system that is failing.
|
|
|
Post by folatre on Mar 12, 2015 21:04:38 GMT -5
No club that supposedly tried to bring immediate help at the deadline is showing fewer points for the trouble than the Habs. Honestly I would rather have back those picks and just let guys like Tinordi, Thomas, and Bornival play.
|
|
|
Post by Douper on Mar 12, 2015 21:05:45 GMT -5
I think we have the team to win the east. But not the way we are playing. We need to be the aggressor. You can't sit back and play 5 in front of the net all the time.
MT's system is looking more and more like Jacques Martin's.
We need to attack
|
|
|
Post by folatre on Mar 12, 2015 21:11:37 GMT -5
Douper, I agree with your second and third point, but I have to disagree with the first. I see the Rangers stable of forwards and d-men is superior to the Habs. Therefore, for me at least, Price vs. Lundvquist would not to be decisive.
|
|