|
|
Post by OopyDoopy on Jan 17, 2010 15:02:35 GMT -5
|
|
|
|
Post by franko on Jan 17, 2010 15:20:05 GMT -5
I'm sure glad we have Eklund to keep us up to date . . . where would be be/what we would do without him?
Bah . . .
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 17, 2010 15:37:40 GMT -5
I'm sure glad we have Eklund to keep us up to date . . . where would be be/what we would do without him? Bah . . . Well, he does manage to start conversation...though most of it is about how we shouldn't buy what Eklund is saying. |
|
|
|
Post by HFTO on Jan 17, 2010 15:38:18 GMT -5
Wow!!!!! from Cogliano to Kovalchuk these players became superstars overnight.... another couple days and we'll get Croaby and or Ove keep going eklund were getting better by the minute.
HFTO
|
|
|
|
Post by franko on Jan 17, 2010 20:00:03 GMT -5
Getting back to what HFLA said, I have a hard time reading Eklund and principle in the same sentence, even if they are separated with a slash.  More than that, what exactly is "a deal in principle"? Is it like buying a house in the UK, where I can make an offer, have it accepted, but just before I sign the papers someone ups the $ and I lose the house? |
|
|
|
Post by Willie Dog on Jan 31, 2010 13:43:27 GMT -5
Getting back to what HFLA said, I have a hard time reading Eklund and principle in the same sentence, even if they are separated with a slash. More than that, what exactly is "a deal in principle"? Is it like buying a house in the UK, where I can make an offer, have it accepted, but just before I sign the papers someone ups the $ and I lose the house? ya, a contract is a contract unless someone comes in with more cash... what a stupid system. They call it getting gazunked, on eBay they call it sniping. All the same poop |
|
|
|
Post by jkr on Jan 31, 2010 14:44:45 GMT -5
Getting back to what HFLA said, I have a hard time reading Eklund and principle in the same sentence, even if they are separated with a slash. More than that, what exactly is "a deal in principle"? Is it like buying a house in the UK, where I can make an offer, have it accepted, but just before I sign the papers someone ups the $ and I lose the house? I have to give Eklund limited props. He's been talking about a Phaneuf trade for weeks & I thought it wouldn't happen. |
|
|
|
Post by HFTO on Jan 31, 2010 15:25:18 GMT -5
I wouldn't give him too much credit it's been talked about for quite some time especially as he struggled and the need for the Flames to get more scoring up front.The amount of dollars the Flames have tied up on the back end would signal some type of move eventually,you can now put the Leafs in that category.
He however does have a following and desperate fans looking for any sort of hope for their team will eventually flock their.The only thing I don't like is the fact he throws out ever rumour reputable or not from every source and hopes something eventually sticks,thats where he loses credibility.
HFTO
|
|
|
|
Post by Habs_fan_in_LA on Jan 31, 2010 16:34:54 GMT -5
Eklund reminds me of Jim Cramer. He picks 30 stocks, one of them goes up and he says, "there, I told you so!"
Both are obnoxious too!
|
|
:quality(70)/cloudfront-us-east-1.images.arcpublishing.com/archetype/6F6VF25GCFF2HFJCOITRJSGNPE.jpg)