|
|
Post by Disgruntled70sHab on Jun 7, 2014 17:28:20 GMT -5
Don't know who Kenny MacMillan is but it's an interesting opinion. See: "A Second Thomas Vanek For Matt Moulson Trade Would Benefit Montreal Canadiens Greatly." Cheers. |
|
|
|
Post by GNick99 on Jun 8, 2014 4:22:19 GMT -5
Don't know who Kenny MacMillan is but it's an interesting opinion. See: "A Second Thomas Vanek For Matt Moulson Trade Would Benefit Montreal Canadiens Greatly." Cheers. I would sign an Ignila or Alfredsson type. That way we add 55 point scorer without being committed to big long term contract. |
|
|
|
Post by BadCompany on Jun 10, 2014 7:58:31 GMT -5
Moulson's one goal in ten playoff games is hardly awe-inspiring.
His numbers also dropped off significantly once away from John Tavares and the Islanders. I could be wrong, but it wouldn't surprise me if he would be nothing more than a 20 goal, 45 point player with us. Sure, we could use another 20 goal scorer (who couldn't?) but at the likely cost of a five year, $30+ million contract? Buyer beware...
|
|
|
|
Post by blny on Jun 10, 2014 8:22:58 GMT -5
Moulson is certainly a second class citizen compared to a Vanek. I do think we have the play making centers to keep Moulson in a 25-30g and 50 plus point pace though. He's got a quick release and an accurate shot. He works well from the slot area too. Might be a good PP specialist for someone as well.
|
|
