|
|
Post by IamCanadiens on Aug 9, 2007 16:23:48 GMT -5
More Trade Ekulation:
As a contingency, the Canadiens are also looking at possible deal with the Edmonton Oilers I am told. One deal I heard discussed would send Horcoff and a prospect to Montreal in exchange for Halak and a pick.
|
|
|
|
Post by habmeister on Aug 9, 2007 16:30:27 GMT -5
hmmmm, i'm not a big horcoff fan and halak has star potential, but he's stuck behind price and huet. that is why nobody loads up on goalie prospects, hard to get full value in a trade unless they're you're #1 and then yo
|
|
|
|
Post by Skilly on Aug 9, 2007 19:58:26 GMT -5
Well that makes no sense .....
They already have Roloson and Garon. They want to trade one of their best players for a goalie prospect?
If its true than what is stopping Gainey ... I'd do that in a heartbeat.
|
|
|
|
Post by IamCanadiens on Aug 9, 2007 20:45:15 GMT -5
Well that makes no sense ..... They already have Roloson and Garon. They want to trade one of their best players for a goalie prospect? If its true than what is stopping Gainey ... I'd do that in a heartbeat. Maybe its a 4 way trade and the Habs will get Marleau AND Lecavalier. ;D |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 9, 2007 23:32:11 GMT -5
I'd rather have Pisani.
|
|
|
|
Post by Doc Holliday on Aug 13, 2007 8:30:40 GMT -5
Eklund throws so many things out there that you have to think he's making a lot of it up...
Horcoff is not an upgrade on anything we have IMO.
|
|
|
|
Post by jkr on Aug 13, 2007 10:32:34 GMT -5
Montreal doesn't need Horcoff & Edmonton doesn't need Halak. Eklund should think a little before he writes.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 13, 2007 14:38:33 GMT -5
Montreal doesn't need Horcoff & Edmonton doesn't need Halak. Eklund should think a little before he writes. Doesn't that require credibility? |
|
