|
Post by MPLABBE on Nov 18, 2002 9:36:54 GMT -5
if you are ready to pony up some nice assets www.nypost.com/sports/rangers/25528.htmThey can't possibly think of going with Blackburn only if they want to make the playoffs...hmm maybe Kloucek+Lundmark for Hackett ;D
|
|
|
Post by UberCranky on Nov 18, 2002 10:17:54 GMT -5
Hey, they finally see what I see...........
|
|
|
Post by Viper on Nov 18, 2002 10:27:53 GMT -5
As much as i'd like to see something like that Marc i believe the rags will just sign Dafold that's more their style to overpay a free agent than give up assets to acquire hackett. I figure it'll get done shortly if at all. Why not Fichaud maybe the kid has NHL experience and a bunch of that unlocked Potential. Maybe Sather is a bigger meathead since leaving Edmonton than we imagined.
|
|
|
Post by Douper on Nov 18, 2002 11:19:19 GMT -5
They need help on Lindros's wing. Eric and Bure are just not panning out. So they need help up front....How about Hackett, Chow and Dykhuis for Purinton and Lundmark or Nedved
|
|
|
Post by MPLABBE on Nov 18, 2002 12:01:45 GMT -5
They need LW's not RW's(like us), I don't see a match there.
Viper, why would they choose Dafold, who hasn't played in months, who wants 4-5 million per year, chocked in the playoffs AND is just as injury prone as Hackett?
|
|
|
Post by Viper on Nov 18, 2002 12:31:53 GMT -5
They need LW's not RW's(like us), I don't see a match there. Viper, why would they choose Dafold, who hasn't played in months, who wants 4-5 million per year, chocked in the playoffs AND is just as injury prone as Hackett? for the same reason they've signed a bunch of overpriced malcontent's like lindros bure malakhov etcetera. It just seems to me that that has become the ranger's style. logically it has plus and minuses pluses. It won't cost them any resources so they could still use the ones they don't wwant in other deals. Dafold is younger and could be around longer than hackett while blackburn grows. Minus He hasn't played in months as you mention. He is injury prone (but hack has been as well so this is a wash by comparison.) other factor's Hack is obviously the more prepared of the two and IMO a much better performer but the ranger's are one of our direct competitor's for a playoff birth so unless one GM feel's he's ripping the other off and one is oblivious to getting ripped(which is highly highly unlikely) i don't see a deal going down for Hack. Sather will try Dafoe first before giving up resources to help improve us. Even if it means his team only slightly improves with dafold because that way the rags are better while we stay the same.
|
|
|
Post by MPLABBE on Nov 18, 2002 12:33:31 GMT -5
Sather doesn't give a **** about the future and assets. If Hackett, in his mind, is better than Dafoe, he'll go after him
|
|
|
Post by Viper on Nov 18, 2002 12:46:34 GMT -5
Sather doesn't give a **** about the future and assets. If Hackett, in his mind, is better than Dafoe, he'll go after him then i don't want lundmark or purinton i want to give them audette as well bring up Hossa and grap a pick from them preferrably a second unless we can throw in a second and get a first since sather don't give a crap about that stuff.
|
|
|
Post by BillPickles on Nov 18, 2002 14:59:22 GMT -5
Rangers+Hackett=Playoffs-Habs.
|
|
|
Post by MPLABBE on Nov 18, 2002 16:06:53 GMT -5
I disagree. Rangers have so many problems even Hackett couldn't fix them. Theodore will be fine once he gets in a ''groove'' again
|
|
|
Post by larek on Nov 18, 2002 16:46:53 GMT -5
Going to have to get something good from Rangers to send Hackett there,otherwise keep him or look at other teams in need,no hurry AS take your time and make a good deal if you cant find a deal which helps this team then keep Hackett!
|
|