|
|
Post by MPLABBE on Apr 27, 2003 11:05:08 GMT -5
GO DOGS GO!!!
|
|
|
|
Post by MPLABBE on Apr 27, 2003 15:56:46 GMT -5
the scoring so far..
1ST PRD: MTB - CHRIS NIELSEN 1 (BRYAN HELMER) 0:43
HAM - (PP) MICHAEL RYDER 3 (JARRET STOLL, RON HAINSEY) 5:27
4 points in 5 games for Hainsey now ;D
|
|
|
|
Post by MPLABBE on Apr 27, 2003 17:17:04 GMT -5
Still 1-1 in the 3rd period..
|
|
|
|
Post by MPLABBE on Apr 27, 2003 17:52:05 GMT -5
d**n it we losae 2-1:
2nd goal..
3RD PRD: MTB - NATHAN SMITH 2 (ZENITH KOMARNISKI, BRIAN CHAPMAN)
16:17
|
|
|
|
Post by M. Beaux-Eaux on Apr 28, 2003 4:48:21 GMT -5
From: DANIELB777 (danielb777@aol.com)
Subject: Game 1: HAM vs. MAN - postgame prospect report
This is the only article in this thread
View: Original Format
Newsgroups: alt.sports.hockey.nhl.mtl-canadiens
Date: 2003-04-27 18:45:45 PST
After clinching 1st place in the AHL, & then making fast work of Springfield,
today it looked as if the Bulldogs figured they just needed to show up in order
to win. Hamilton was outworked in a 2-1 loss of game 1 @ Copps Coliseum,
showing evidence of rust & a lack of intensity in the process. I was quite
disappointed with the performance of our guys. Especially guys recently sent
down from MTL, who seem to be suffering from a profound lack of confidence.
Here's my evaluation:
Michael Ryder: 9/10 threat to score every shift - creates space for himself &
quickly unleashes hard, accurate wristshot - does his share of hitting - soft
hands - very effective in the corners - good playmaker - nice blend of skill &
grit.
Ryder scored the only HAM goal by splitting the MAN defence @ the blueline,
fighting through them, and then releasing a quick, low wrist shot from the slot
to beat the MAN goaltender [Mike Minard] on the stick side.
Jason Ward: 7/10 hardest-working Bulldog - effective on PK - seemed to be
fighting the puck - missed on a couple of scoring chances - aggressive play
forced numerous turnovers in the offensive & neutral zones - was not overly
physical - sound defensively - some giveaways forcing low-percentage passing
attempts - took bonehead 3rd period slashing penalty in offensive zone.
Plekanec: 7/10 good defensive work ethic - nice passing - does not shy from
physical play - anticipates play well - work paid few dividends owing to
lacklustre play of linemates Hossa & Czerkawski - would have been better served
feeding Ryder or Ward - taking more risks in the attack zone should pay
considerable dividends.
Marcel Hossa: 6/10 mediocre intensity - neglected physical play - found some
openings & chances but failed to capitalize - played mostly on periphery - okay
defensively - reluctant to carry the puck - dished it off hastily & sometimes
unwisely - decent play in corners & on the boards - lacks confidence in his
considerable abilities.
Bill Lindsay: 6/10 loads of energy - lacks hockey smarts - effective on PK -
passing was surprisingly on the money - contributes very little offensively -
physical edge was missing - failed to spur teammates - unlikely to see future
NHL action.
Mike Komisarek: 6/10 usual quick, accurate outlet pass was not in evidence -
applied several high-impact bodychecks - effectively cleared front of net -
reluctant to join rush - okay defensive coverage - two penalties were of an
unwise nature - good intensity level - intimidating physical presence diffused
that of opposition tough guy.
Ron Hainsey: 6/10 breakout pass was missing in 2nd & 3rd periods - adds nice
offensive element - takes intelligent risks joining the rush - does not impose
himself physically - finess defensive style will prove ineffective in NHL
action - makes good use of his dangerous shot - nice PPQB - confidence could
use a boost - evidence of rust from injury-induced absence.
François Beauchemin: 6/10 good defensive coverage - play lacked usual edge -
nice PK performance - showed willingness to block shots - was non-factor on
offence - was not effective @ setting up transition game - relied on Rivetesque
cross-check method in lieu of sound positioning - effective @ clearing front of
net.
Benoît Gratton: 5/10 timing was drastically off - reluctant to dole out
physical punishment - slow shot release translated into missed chances -
willing to enter high traffic zones & absorb punishment - still rusty after
lengthy absence from wrist injury - strong leadership qualities.
Marius Czerkawski: 4/10 seemed disinterested - ineffective @ utilizing
linemates - was ineffective on point during PP - should have been benched after
3rd period pass @ centre ice to own goalie during line change led to numerous
opposition scoring chances - flash failed to materialize into desired results -
willing to shoot the puck - should be scratched for game 2 in favour of Balej.
I anticipate a stronger HAM performance in game 2. Despite having a decisive
edge in talent, the Bulldogs must realize after today's contest that a stronger
effort is required to prevail against their trap-minded, hard-working MAN
opponents.
|
|
|
|
Post by montreal on Apr 28, 2003 20:24:45 GMT -5
Great report, thanks mr bozo. I missed the game as I was having system problems.  Sucks cause I found a link to watch the BC/Halifax game, but couldn't watch it. Anyway that was good reading. Daniel777 might have been a little hard on Komo, as he was named the sparkplug of the game, but I can't say since I didn't catch it. |
|
Sucks cause I found a link to watch the BC/Halifax game, but couldn't watch it. Anyway that was good reading. Daniel777 might have been a little hard on Komo, as he was named the sparkplug of the game, but I can't say since I didn't catch it.