|
|
Post by Disgruntled70sHab on Jul 5, 2016 19:53:45 GMT -5
|
|
|
|
Post by blny on Jul 6, 2016 13:47:57 GMT -5
 It's my go-to. I find the layout friendlier than say nhlnumbers.com. None are capgeek, but I find this one comes close. |
|
|
|
Post by Tankdriver on Jul 6, 2016 14:31:16 GMT -5
It's scary that with the team we have we are at the top with the least amount of cap space.
|
|
|
|
Post by franko on Jul 6, 2016 14:35:41 GMT -5
It's scary that with the team we have we are at the top with the least amount of cap space. ah, but MB cleared a bit with that trade (I guess Bones and Anonymous are right -- every thread can and probably will include the strange doings this summer for a while). |
|
|
|
Post by blny on Jul 6, 2016 14:45:09 GMT -5
It's scary that with the team we have we are at the top with the least amount of cap space. It's a bit deceiving. There's a number of signed players that won't be there at the same time. With 15 forwards signed, at least 2 are going to be in St John's. A couple of those guys are on two-way contracts that will pay them their full salary regardless of where they are. I expect a couple may be waived. On defense, there are 8 signed showing up as NHL contracts, but Redmond can be demoted. He will be. One of Lindgren, Condon, or Montoya will be the back up. With Condon and Montoya on the summer roster, that's more money showing up. In the end, there's at least a couple of million dollars in actual space that will be reflected at the start of the season. |
|
|
|
Post by jkr on Jul 6, 2016 20:59:45 GMT -5
I noticed they lists terms like NTC beside the player's name. Didn't see anything beside Subban's name. Just an oversight?
|
|
|
|
Post by blny on Jul 6, 2016 22:26:19 GMT -5
www.capfriendly.com/players/pk-subbanIt says that Nashville 'didn't honour the ntc'. I'm not sure what that means. It sounds like a condition of the trade was that the clause is now void.
|
|
|
|
Post by jkr on Jul 7, 2016 11:33:12 GMT -5
www.capfriendly.com/players/pk-subbanIt says that Nashville 'didn't honour the ntc'. I'm not sure what that means. It sounds like a condition of the trade was that the clause is now void. Wouldn't Subban & his agent have to agree to that? How can you pick & choose what parts of a contract to honor? |
|
|
|
Post by blny on Jul 7, 2016 15:58:38 GMT -5
www.capfriendly.com/players/pk-subbanIt says that Nashville 'didn't honour the ntc'. I'm not sure what that means. It sounds like a condition of the trade was that the clause is now void. Wouldn't Subban & his agent have to agree to that? How can you pick & choose what parts of a contract to honor? They would definitely have to agree. Maybe Subban was thinking, "whatever gets me out of town". He gives Nashville an honest try. If it doesn't work, he moves on. |
|
|
|
Post by jkr on Jul 7, 2016 16:17:39 GMT -5
Wouldn't Subban & his agent have to agree to that? How can you pick & choose what parts of a contract to honor? They would definitely have to agree. Maybe Subban was thinking, "whatever gets me out of town". He gives Nashville an honest try. If it doesn't work, he moves on. Unless I am missing something here, if he agreed to waive the NMC then the whole June 30th deadline is meaningless. More time could have been taken to work on a trade without the pressure of a deadline. |
|
|
|
Post by Tankdriver on Jul 7, 2016 22:21:34 GMT -5
I think I read somewhere that a NMC is only valid with the original team signing the contract. Once you are traded, it then becomes nul and void.
|
|
|
|
Post by PTH on Jul 7, 2016 22:55:05 GMT -5
I think I read somewhere that a NMC is only valid with the original team signing the contract. Once you are traded, it then becomes nul and void. That was my understanding as well. The NMC only got activated if PK was still a Hab. |
|
|
|
Post by jkr on Jul 8, 2016 6:29:43 GMT -5
I noticed that Petry's NMC seems to be like Subban's deal - it kicks in 2 years after the contract starts. Why wouldn't a player want this protection from the beginning of the contract? Or is the team asking for a time period where they have the freedom to move a player without his say so?
|
|
|
|
Post by Disgruntled70sHab on Aug 25, 2016 10:29:20 GMT -5
I noticed that Petry's NMC seems to be like Subban's deal - it kicks in 2 years after the contract starts. Why wouldn't a player want this protection from the beginning of the contract? Or is the team asking for a time period where they have the freedom to move a player without his say so? Will be interesting to see if Jeff Petry is still in Montreal when that NMC kicks in ... he might be, who knows ... Marc Bergevin now has two years to develop some defensive talent to replace him with ... not saying this will play out, but there seems to be a method the Bergevin's madness when negotiating contracts ... Cheers. |
|
