|
Post by Ryan on Feb 3, 2002 22:53:46 GMT -5
Let's win the Cup ;D
After watching the Pats pull of the unthinkable, I'm thinking this could be the year of the upset. It sure started out on the right foot.
I've heard a lot of grumblings about this team being a lot like '93, and while I won't go that far, I'm not ready to write this team off.
Only Patrick has been better than Theo this year, so let's ride this hot goalie as far as we can, and just hope the injury bug bites someone else in the butt for once.
Zed keep it up, Gilmour you da man, Theo you're close to Saint-hood, and all the rest of you keep hustling and keep skating. We can be as good as anyone in the East on any given night.
GO HABS GO!!!
|
|
|
Post by MPLABBE on Feb 4, 2002 15:57:13 GMT -5
It would be awesome,check that,freakin awesome ;D
I think the 1993 team had more talent though.Damphousse,Leclair,Muller,Bellows,etc up front...Desjardins,Schneider,Brisebois,etc on defence.
I don't think we have that kind of skill-yet.
|
|
|
Post by seventeen on Feb 4, 2002 23:18:12 GMT -5
I think you need more evidence. With the Pats, it was ordained (pun intentional) when they beat Oakland. How else do you explain some guy (on a whim) choosing to review a play when no one else, including the fumbling quarterback or his coach, felt it was anything but a fumble. And then, how do you explain this same guy, who either has multiple cataracts or neural paths that are welded to his rectum, deciding that an obvious fumble was actually an incomplete pass. Are the Gods Crazy, or are they just vindictive? <br> So, if you see the Habs overcoming a 3 goal deficit in the 3rd period and then scoring in overtime, on a clearing pass by Theo, who hits a Bruin on the helmet, causing the puck to change direction, slide down Dafoe's back, hit 2 posts and trickle in, then, I will agree that there is indeed a chance for us to take Stanley's beer mug. (please don't worry folks, we are getting him help. To much sugar in his diet. HA)
|
|