|
Post by blny on Apr 29, 2015 17:31:22 GMT -5
CH, I think I brought that up elsewhere, perhaps the PGT for the game, for the same reasons. He's a riverboat gambler. Methot's his pair at ES, and he can and does just sit back and covers.
There's no questioning Karlsson's talent. I just question him being the best all around defenseman.
|
|
|
Post by Doc Holliday on Apr 29, 2015 18:04:14 GMT -5
Funny enough, there is not ONE player in the league I would trade Subban for one-for-one.... Yeah. A good sanity check on the Norris is would you trade Subban for either Karlsson or Doughty? My answer would be NFW. Karlsson is an elite offenive talent but Subban is pretty close and a far better and tougher all around dman. Doughty is super smooth but I still think Subban is the more impact player. He probably won't win it, but PK should win the Norris hands down. I tell you what Boston, any player who can win the Norris while being paired to a pylon like Josh Gorges is quite the player.
|
|
|
Post by CentreHice on Apr 29, 2015 19:22:04 GMT -5
CH, I think I brought that up elsewhere, perhaps the PGT for the game, for the same reasons. He's a riverboat gambler. Methot's his pair at ES, and he can and does just sit back and covers. There's no questioning Karlsson's talent. I just question him being the best all around defenseman. Sorry, blny….I missed that. But I'm talking about the media types….who were such fanboys of Karlsson that their confirmation bias blinded them. Maybe they DID point it out in other clips….but I didn't hear it. I had the sound up right after the goal was scored.
|
|
|
Post by blny on Apr 29, 2015 19:35:06 GMT -5
CH, I think I brought that up elsewhere, perhaps the PGT for the game, for the same reasons. He's a riverboat gambler. Methot's his pair at ES, and he can and does just sit back and covers. There's no questioning Karlsson's talent. I just question him being the best all around defenseman. Sorry, blny….I missed that. But I'm talking about the media types….who were such fanboys of Karlsson that their confirmation bias blinded them. Maybe they DID point it out in other clips….but I didn't hear it. I had the sound up right after the goal was scored. Didn't mean it that way. Meant it in agreement. I didn't share the video of the play at the time. No need to be sorry.
|
|
|
Post by franko on Apr 29, 2015 19:36:18 GMT -5
CH, I think I brought that up elsewhere, perhaps the PGT for the game, for the same reasons. He's a riverboat gambler. Methot's his pair at ES, and he can and does just sit back and covers. There's no questioning Karlsson's talent. I just question him being the best all around defenseman. Sorry, blny….I missed that. But I'm talking about the media types….who were such fanboys of Karlsson that their confirmation bias blinded them. Maybe they DID point it out in other clips….but I didn't hear it. I had the sound up right after the goal was scored. Meh, he breeds excitement. Woo hoo. For a bit Hammond was mentioned in the Hart discussion too, because of the Sens race to the playoffs. If they'd lost a game or two and been out of the race Karlsson wouldn't be in the mix.
|
|
|
Post by CentreHice on Apr 29, 2015 19:39:39 GMT -5
Sorry, blny….I missed that. But I'm talking about the media types….who were such fanboys of Karlsson that their confirmation bias blinded them. Maybe they DID point it out in other clips….but I didn't hear it. I had the sound up right after the goal was scored. Didn't mean it that way. Meant it in agreement. I didn't share the video of the play at the time. No need to be sorry. I didn't mean it as an apology, either! Ha! Just an off-the-cuff, "Oops missed that." Ha! The intent isn't always conveyed via the written word.
|
|
|
Post by blny on Apr 29, 2015 19:42:52 GMT -5
Didn't mean it that way. Meant it in agreement. I didn't share the video of the play at the time. No need to be sorry. I didn't mean it as an apology, either! Ha! Just an off-the-cuff, "Oops missed that." Ha! The intent isn't always conveyed via the written word. True dat.
|
|