|
Post by Montrealer on Jan 10, 2003 14:06:29 GMT -5
Hackett + Audette + Kilger + Traverse + Dykhuis for McLaren + Girard Why? 1) We tell Boston they have to take Audette's salary to get Hackett. 2) We get 2 pretty damn good D-men for 2 that won't make the cut next year 3) I like to dream...
|
|
|
Post by larek on Jan 10, 2003 14:10:05 GMT -5
How about Hackett,Brisbois , balej for Mclaren ,Lapointe ,then send Lapointe to Rangers for Lundmark!
|
|
|
Post by Doc Holliday on Jan 10, 2003 14:16:39 GMT -5
How about..... Hackett(3.6 M) Audette(3M) Kilger or Bulis(around 1M) Balej(gotta give some quality in there) for: McLaren(no salary this year) Lapointe(5+ M) is it fair? can the Bruins take on a million or two Marc, nobody believes that Kilger will be a PF... Riding the pine of our 2 best forwards for a few games doesn't make Kilger a ligit first liner. If you really wanna deal with Boston, throw Hainsey's name out and you'll have a partner to trade with. Hackett, Hainsey, Audette (or Chow) for McLaren, Lapointe That would be a great trade.
|
|
|
Post by Boston_Habs on Jan 10, 2003 14:31:04 GMT -5
McLaren will not be dealt for a 34-year old pending free agent goalie, no matter how well he's playing. The Boston ship has started to spring other leaks, so it's not like Hackett makes them Stanley Cup ready.
Besides any deal with Hackett is going to involve at least Ron Hainsey, given he's a local product and the type of puck-moving Dman Boston needs, but if we were to deal Hainsey it should ONLY be for an upgrade at the forward position, IMO.
|
|
|
Post by TheHabsfan on Jan 10, 2003 14:34:38 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by habwest on Jan 10, 2003 15:16:14 GMT -5
Unfortunately, Hainsey is the kind of puck moving dman we badly need as well. I dunno, I have the impression that McLaren is a tad overrated. Let's not forget that he was part of the defence that the Habs made look pretty slow and suspect.
|
|
|
Post by rocky on Jan 10, 2003 15:20:14 GMT -5
Titre Un échange à trois sur le point de se finaliser................. Message En effet Montréal, Boston et Los Angeles
Los Angeles reçoit Dykhuis et Lapointe
Boston reçoit Schneider et Hackett
Montréal reçoit McLaren et Laperriere Here's a new one from the RDS forum, perhaps you have all read this, interesting but highly unlikely, 3 way trades are rare. LA is the big loser,imho
|
|
|
Post by MPLABBE on Jan 10, 2003 16:28:48 GMT -5
Titre Un échange à trois sur le point de se finaliser................. Message En effet Montréal, Boston et Los Angeles Los Angeles reçoit Dykhuis et Lapointe Boston reçoit Schneider et Hackett Montréal reçoit McLaren et Laperriere Here's a new one from the RDS forum, perhaps you have all read this, interesting but highly unlikely, 3 way trades are rare. LA is the big loser,imho LOL mr rumeur again? McLaren and Lappy for Hack and Dykhuis...that is such a steal for us it isn't even funny..
|
|
|
Post by rocky on Jan 10, 2003 16:46:58 GMT -5
LOL mr rumeur again? McLaren and Lappy for Hack and Dykhuis...that is such a steal for us it isn't even funny.. this is by monsieur echange, wouldn't be the same person,nah ;D
|
|
|
Post by GARB08 on Jan 10, 2003 18:14:23 GMT -5
people yes there is a chance that Garon can become a free agent at the end of the year,but lets not assume that we will lose him.He has not proven himself, yet , at the nhl level and I doubt that there will be a long list of suiters ,needing his services.therefor if they need to deal hackett ,then deal him because there is a good offer on the table.dont deal him because we need to give garon a shot
|
|
|
Post by UberCranky on Jan 10, 2003 18:17:12 GMT -5
Didn't Garon clear waivers a few months ago? All of a sudden he is a hot commodity?
|
|
|
Post by GARB08 on Jan 10, 2003 18:27:49 GMT -5
habsaddict..........you are correct
|
|
|
Post by MPLABBE on Jan 10, 2003 18:31:32 GMT -5
But in the summer...goalies will retire, some will leave via UFA...some more room for Garon in the NHL
If you were Garon, would you re-sign with the Habs? and be stuck in Theo's shadow for ever?
|
|
|
Post by GARB08 on Jan 10, 2003 18:36:37 GMT -5
well marc if we lose garon................we just sign barrasso,everybody signs barrasso
|
|
|
Post by MPLABBE on Jan 10, 2003 18:40:58 GMT -5
well marc if we lose garon................we just sign barrasso,everybody signs barrasso or Wade Flaherty so he can stop beating us in crucial games in March(yes that 2-1 loss vs the Panthers last year still bothers me )
|
|
|
Post by GoMtl on Jan 10, 2003 18:42:59 GMT -5
Hainsey, Hackett, Petrov, Kilger, Dykhuis McLaren, Girard, Rolston.
Boston needs a #1 goalie, a puck moving stud d-man (home grown), and forwards... if we give them 2 d-men, they'll likely need 2 in return, Dykhuis is filler, they likely wouldn't make the same mistake twice on Traverse.
Montreal needs defensemen, and a big 2-way centreman.
|
|
|
Post by MPLABBE on Jan 10, 2003 18:44:30 GMT -5
Hainsey, Hackett, Petrov, Kilger, Lindsay McLaren, Girard, Rolston Boston needs a #1 goalie, a puck moving stud d-man (home grown), and forwards. Montreal needs defensemen, and a big 2-way centreman. McLaren is probably going to the Isles for Isbister so this will put an end to all these trade Hainsey to Boston posts you guys are coming up with ;D
|
|
|
Post by GoMtl on Jan 10, 2003 18:47:34 GMT -5
DAMN... well not really, i don't like McLaren anyways, i just wanted to throw my hand into the pot with this whole talk. I'd really like Rolston though. and i changed my proposal around a bit... figured they would want another d-man. Isbister... hmm... we sure could use a guy like him, although we do have the poor man's version Chad Kilger, I guess Isbister would be a poor man's Bertuzzi or Thornton though.
|
|
|
Post by PTH on Jan 10, 2003 18:55:20 GMT -5
Titre Un échange à trois sur le point de se finaliser................. Message En effet Montréal, Boston et Los Angeles Los Angeles reçoit Dykhuis et Lapointe Boston reçoit Schneider et Hackett Montréal reçoit McLaren et Laperriere Here's a new one from the RDS forum, perhaps you have all read this, interesting but highly unlikely, 3 way trades are rare. LA is the big loser,imho The RDS fanboard is essentially meaningless as a source.... let's not even waste time going there..... if we're going to debate internet rumours, let's at the very least look to vaguely reputable rumour sites where you know it's not total trash...
|
|
|
Post by PTH on Jan 10, 2003 18:57:11 GMT -5
Didn't Garon clear waivers a few months ago? All of a sudden he is a hot commodity? Not "hot" as is terribly in demand, but the guy will be a UFA, and a lot of teams at that point will be looking for a goalie, and a few will bid to get a chance..... while he's proven nothing to date, he's at the age where goalies can break through, I'm sure some team will be out to get him. Some low budget team like Pittsburgh might sign him in the hopes that he can become a cheap #1.
|
|
|
Post by PTH on Jan 10, 2003 19:01:33 GMT -5
yeah but if we give up Audette in the deal...bad contract for bad contract.. at least Lapointe has some grit, playoff experience, stanley cup rings, leadership and is in his prime.... Totally agree here. Lapointe can contribute something even when not scoring, he's a much better rounded player who can play on any line. For that very reason, I doubt we'll get him for someone like Audette - the Bruins can see how bad Audette is as well as we can. If they want to trade Lapointe, it won't be for another big contract that's totally useless. *sigh*
|
|
|
Post by Habs_fan_in_LA on Jan 10, 2003 19:39:30 GMT -5
How about: Give them Brisebois, Traverse, Audette, Czerkawski, Juneau and Dackell for Thornton and Rolston. If they don't go for that try: Give them Brisebois, Traverse, Audette, and Czerkawski for Rolston and they keep Thornton. If they don't go for that try; Give them Brisebois, Traverse, Audette, and Czerkawski and they can keep Rolston too.
|
|
|
Post by rocky on Jan 10, 2003 21:13:08 GMT -5
The RDS fanboard is essentially meaningless as a source.... let's not even waste time going there..... if we're going to debate internet rumours, let's at the very least look to vaguely reputable rumour sites where you know it's not total trash... Is this the famous Paul the Hab Fan? If so, I remember you from way back on a board before slam ( can't recall its title, sorry )? Either way its nice to hear from you. Actually the RDS thing is a little running joke with Marc, but your're right no need to post the stuff from there. If you see this please respond, thanks
|
|
|
Post by Raven on Jan 10, 2003 21:34:19 GMT -5
The FAN radio network outta Toronto said that McLaren's agent was asked about this and said that he has no idea where these rumors are coming from...take it as you will.
Talking about the Isles deal of course.
|
|
|
Post by PTH on Jan 10, 2003 21:36:32 GMT -5
Is the the famous Paul the Hab Fan? If so, I remember you from way back on a board before slam ( can't recall its title, sorry )? Either way its nice to hear from you. Actually the RDS thing is a little running joke with Marc, but your're right no need to post the stuff from there. If you see this please respond, thanks Hey there - yup, it's me. I think you're talking about the Rumour Mill from way back when. I gave up on that place years ago, but it's still out there, somewhere. I can't beleive how much of my adolescence was spent on there arguing meaningless points.... sometimes looking around here I wind up thinking we all go through an over-eager stage. As to RDS (land of over-eagers if I ever saw one), happy to know that you don't take it seriously, either :-)
|
|
|
Post by UberCranky on Jan 10, 2003 21:52:44 GMT -5
I can't beleive how much of my adolescence was spent on there arguing meaningless points.... So are you saying your reposnes now are less meaningless? Do you realize that you left yourself sooo open for a, hackum, response? Good thimg that I am above such things.................not.
|
|
|
Post by PTH on Jan 10, 2003 22:44:00 GMT -5
They want Hackett? They REALLY want him? McLaren is the price. That's it, that's all. We are going to be fighting with those booins for the final playoff spot. Better get something that will help us for years to come and solve a huge(!) problem on our defence Hell throw in Traverse if they need a d-man in return Asking for McLaren essentially means not trading Hack - wouldn't be better off looking at some intermediate point, so that we can get something useful in return ? Doesn't have to be from a playoff rival.....
|
|
|
Post by MPLABBE on Jan 10, 2003 22:51:03 GMT -5
Depends what they offer.
If it's a player who can help us and solve a need on the team...future or present...by all means consider it.
|
|
|
Post by legaspesien on Jan 10, 2003 22:53:37 GMT -5
I say Hackett in the west in the next 4 or 5 weeks anyway before trading deadline one of Anaheim,San Jose,Los Angeles,Phoenix all out from the playoof as of today...
We will domp salary,get a 2nd or a 3rd round at the best promote Garon to keep the right on him or receive a UFA like Hackett at a close salary of his...My dream Marchment from San Jose
|
|
|
Post by rocky on Jan 10, 2003 23:15:11 GMT -5
Hey there - yup, it's me. I think you're talking about the Rumour Mill from way back when. I gave up on that place years ago, but it's still out there, somewhere. The Rumor Mill it was indeed, lots of wars on there ;D I am happy to say that you were a fierce and loyal hab poster amongst all that clatter. I still remember the time that you declared your name change. I think that Yeti popped up on some of those boards as well. Good to see that you joined habsrus, a most enjoyable site indeed.
|
|